Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026 · Cape Town, South Africa
351-01-018 / 351-01-018 ISMRM Abstract

Low-Cost Open-Source Wireless ECG System for Diagnostic 12-Lead Reconstruction at 0.55 T

Primary: Physics & Engineering - New Devices
Secondary: Physics & Engineering - Low-Field MRI
351-01-018 · Emerging Devices, Novel Capabilities · Monday, 11 May, 8:20 AM–9:56 AM · Power Pitch Theatre 1
351-01-018 · Emerging Devices, Novel Capabilities · Monday, 11 May, 8:20 AM–9:56 AM · Power Pitch Theatre 1
Keywords: Low field Low cost design ECG
Accepted
Félix Muñoz 1, Muzhe Chen2, Ye Tian2, Krishna S Nayak3,4, Yasser Khan1,2
1Alfred E. Mann Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States of America
2Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States of America
3Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States of America
4Alfred E. Mann Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States of America
Presenting Author: Félix Muñoz

Synopsis

Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

Log in

References

1. Wagner GS et al. AHA/ACCF/HRS Recommendations for the Standardization and Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram. Part VI: Acute Ischemia/Infarction A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2009;53(11):1003–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.12.016 [doi]
2. Ryan TJ et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1996;28(5):1328–1428. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(96)00392-7 [doi]
3. Felblinger J, Lehmann C, Boesch C. Electrocardiogram acquisition during MR examinations for patient monitoring and sequence triggering. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 1994;32(4):523–529. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910320416 [doi]
4. Tian Y et al. Feasibility of multiple-view myocardial perfusion MRI using radial simultaneous multi-slice acquisitions. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(2):e0211738. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211738 [doi]
5. Kangarlu A et al. Cognitive, cardiac, and physiological safety studies in ultra high field magnetic resonance imaging. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 1999;17(10):1407–1416. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0730725X99000867. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0730-725X(99)00086-7 [doi]
6. Jekic M et al. Magnetic field threshold for accurate electrocardiography in the MRI environment. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2010;64(6):1586–1591. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.22419 [doi]
7. Nordbeck P et al. Reducing RF-related heating of cardiac pacemaker leads in MRI: Implementation and experimental verification of practical design changes. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2012;68(6):1963–1972. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.24182 [doi]
8. Sijbers J et al. Reduction of ECG and gradient related artifacts in simultaneously recorded human EEG/MRI data. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2000;18(7):881–886. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0730-725X(00)00178-8 [doi]
9. Kolandaivelu A et al. Evaluation of 12-lead electrocardiogram at 0.55T for improved cardiac monitoring in magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. 2024;26(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101009 [doi]
10. Tian Y, Nayak KS. New clinical opportunities of low-field MRI: heart, lung, body, and musculoskeletal. Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine. 2024;37(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-023-01123-w [doi]
11. Tse ZTH et al. A 1.5T MRI-conditional 12-lead electrocardiogram for MRI and intra-MR intervention. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2014;71(3):1336–1347. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.24744 [doi]
12. Dos Reis JE et al. Reconstruction of the 12-lead ECG using a novel MR-compatible ECG sensor network. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2019;82(5):1929–1945. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27854 [doi]
13. Munoz F, Nayak KS, Khan Y. Wearable Sensing in Low-Field (0.55T) MRI Environment. IEEE Sensors Letters. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1109/LSENS.2025.3528305 [doi]
14. Silemek B et al. A temperature sensor implant for active implantable medical devices for in vivo subacute heating tests under MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2018;79(5):2824–2832. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.26914 [doi]
15. Bailey JJ et al. Recommendations for standardization and specifications in automated electrocardiography: bandwidth and digital signal processing. Circulation. 1990;81(2):730–739. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.81.2.730 [doi]
16. Antman E et al. Myocardial infarction redefined - A consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee f or the redefinition of myocardial infarction. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2000;36(3):959–969. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00804-4 [doi]

Cite this abstract

http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/351-01-018