Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026 · Cape Town, South Africa
368-06-003 ISMRM Abstract

Predicting Acoustic Noise and Vibration Trends for Pulse Sequence Parameter Optimization

Primary: Physics & Engineering - Safety
Secondary: Physics & Engineering - Gradients
368-06-003 · Novel Gradients · Monday, 11 May, 5:05 PM–6:00 PM · Digital Posters Row I
Keywords: Gradients Sequence parameters optimization Mri safety Acoustic noise Vibration
Accepted
Tianhao Jiang1, Zhuming Shuai2, Jie Wang2, Xinyuan Xia2, Zijian Zhou 1, Zhihua Ren1,3, Peng Hu1,3
1School of Biomedical Engineering & State Key Laboratory of Advanced Medical Materials and Devices, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China
2Advanced Technology Research Institute, Shanghai United Imaging Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China
3Shanghai Clinical Research and Trial Center, Shanghai, China
Presenting Author: Zijian Zhou

Synopsis

Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

Log in

References

1. Price, D L et al. “Investigation of acoustic noise on 15 MRI scanners from 0.2 T to 3 T.” Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI vol. 13,2 (2001): 288-93. doi:10.1002/1522-2586(200102)13:2<288::aid-jmri1041>3.0.co;2-p [doi]
2. Pellegrino, Giovanni et al. “Resting state network connectivity is attenuated by fMRI acoustic noise.” NeuroImage vol. 247 (2022): 118791. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118791 [doi]
3. McJury, Mark J. “Acoustic Noise and Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Narrative/Descriptive Review.” Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI vol. 55,2 (2022): 337-346. doi:10.1002/jmri.27525 [doi]
4. Ma, Dan et al. “Music-based magnetic resonance fingerprinting to improve patient comfort during MRI examinations.” Magnetic resonance in medicine vol. 75,6 (2016): 2303-14. doi:10.1002/mrm.25818 [doi]
5. Přibil, Jiří et al. “Analysis of the Influence of Different Settings of Scan Sequence Parameters on Vibration and Noise Generated in the Open-Air MRI Scanning Area.” Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) vol. 19,19 4198. 27 Sep. 2019, doi:10.3390/s19194198 [doi]
6. Hedeen, R A, and W A Edelstein. “Characterization and prediction of gradient acoustic noise in MR imagers.” Magnetic resonance in medicine vol. 37,1 (1997): 7-10. doi:10.1002/mrm.1910370103 [doi]
7. Wu, Ziyue et al. “Evaluation of an independent linear model for acoustic noise on a conventional MRI scanner and implications for acoustic noise reduction.” Magnetic resonance in medicine vol. 71,4 (2014): 1613-20. doi:10.1002/mrm.24798 [doi]

Cite this abstract

http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/368-06-003