Synopsis
Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
507-04-009
ISMRM Abstract
Spatio-Temporal Segmentation and Motion Analysis of Uterine Layers in Cine MRI Using Unet-LSTM and FlowNet-Lite
Accepted
Full abstract & presentation
The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.
Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.
To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.
Log inReferences
1. 1. Kuijsters NPM, Methorst WG, Kortenhorst MSQ, Rabotti C, Mischi M, Schoot BC. Uterine peristalsis and fertility: current knowledge and future perspectives: a review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;35(1):50–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.03.019 [doi]
2. Georgiou J, Lekkas K, Varnava G, Sophocleous M, Michaelides A, Tanos V. The ElectroUteroGraph: A Novel tool for assessing uterine Contractions of Non-Pregnant Women. IEEE Open Journal of Engineering in Medicine and Biology. 2022 Jan 1;3:34–40. https://doi.org/10.1109/ojemb.2022.3159097 [doi]
3. Watanabe K, Kataoka M, Yano K, Nishio S, Umehana M, Kido A, et al. Automated detection and measurement of uterine peristalsis in cine MR images. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2014 Dec 1;42(3):644–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.24817 [doi]
4. Latif S, Saeed SU, Hu Y, De Braud L, Yasmin E, Saridogan E, et al. Quantitative analysis of uterine peristalsis on transvaginal sonography in women with adenomyosis using optical flow for motion quantification: inter- and intra-observer reproducibility study. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2025 May 1;105073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2025.105073 [doi]
5. Huang Y, Rees C, Sammali F, Blank C, Schoot D, Mischi M. Characterization of uterine peristaltic waves by ultrasound strain analysis. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control. 2022 Apr 7;69(6):2050–60. https://doi.org/10.1109/tuffc.2022.3165688 [doi]
6. Arbelle A, Raviv TR. Microscopy cell segmentation via convolutional LSTM networks. 2022 IEEE 19th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI). 2019 Apr 1;1008–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/isbi.2019.8759447 [doi]
7. Lotter W, Kreiman G, Cox D. Deep predictive coding networks for video prediction and unsupervised learning. arXiv (Cornell University) [Internet]. 2016 Jan 1. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1605.08104 [doi]
8. Fischer P, Dosovitskiy A, Ilg E, Häusser P, Hazırbaş C, Golkov V, et al. FlowNet: Learning Optical Flow with Convolutional Networks. arXiv (Cornell University) 2015 Jan 1.https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2015.316 [doi]
9. Ilg E, Mayer N, Saikia T, Keuper M, Dosovitskiy A, Brox T. FlowNet 2.0: Evolution of Optical Flow Estimation with Deep Networks. arXiv (Cornell University) [Internet]. 2016 Jan 1.https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2017.179 [doi]
10. Sudre CH, Li W, Vercauteren T, Ourselin S, Cardoso MJ. Generalised dice overlap as a deep learning loss function for highly unbalanced segmentations. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2017 Jan 1;240–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67558-9_28 [doi]
11. Lin TY, Goyal P, Girshick R, He K, Dollar P. Focal loss for dense object detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence [Internet]. 2018 Jul 23;42(2):318–27. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2018.2858826 [doi]
12. Jonschkowski R, Stone A, Barron JT, Gordon A, Konolige K, Angelova A. What matters in unsupervised optical flow. In: Lecture notes in computer science [Internet]. 2020. p. 557–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58536-5_33 [doi]
Cite this abstract
http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/507-04-009