Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026 · Cape Town, South Africa
665-04-011 ISMRM Abstract

Is the ISMRM/NIST Phantom Truly Sequence-Independent? Validation and Vulnerability in High-Resolution T2 Mapping.

Primary: Physics & Engineering - Phantoms
Secondary: Contrast Mechanisms - Relaxometry
665-04-011 · MR in Organoid/Phantom/Plant/Serum · Thursday, 14 May, 2:35 PM–3:30 PM · Digital Posters Row F
Keywords: Relaxometry Uncertainty quantification T2 mapping Phantom study Python
Accepted
Maryam Abarashi1, Thomas A Peterson1, Clara Fallone1, Ali Golestani 1
1University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
Presenting Author: Ali Golestani

Synopsis

Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

Log in

References

1. Stupic KF, et al. A Standard System Phantom for Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Magn Reason Med. 2021;85(5):2846–2857. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28779 [doi]
2. Carr ME, Keenan KE, Rai R, et al. Determining the Longitudinal Accuracy and Reproducibility of T1 and T2 in a 3 T MRI Scanner. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021;22(11):143–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13432 [doi]
3. Korte JC, Chin Z, Carr M, Holloway L, Franich R. Magnetic Resonance Biomarker Assessment Software (MR-BIAS): An Automated Open-Source Tool for the ISMRM/NIST System Phantom. Phys Med Biol. 2023;68(6):06NT01. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/acbcbb [doi]
4. Whittall KP, MacKay AL. Quantitative Interpretation of NMR Relaxation Data. Magn Reson Med. 1989;6(4):407–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2364(89)90011-5 [doi]
5. Jiang Y, Ma D, Keenan KE, et al. Repeatability of Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting T1 and T2 Estimates Assessed Using the ISMRM/NIST MRI System Phantom. Magn Reson Med. 2017;78(4):1452–1457. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.26509 [doi]
6. Daniel F, et al. Assessing the Impact of Imaging Parameters on MRI Measurement of Kidney T2. Magn Reson Imaging. 2025;103:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.70127 [doi]
7. Keenan KE, Carr ME, Stupic KF, et al. Multi-center and Multi-vendor Evaluation of Quantitative MRI Accuracy Using the ISMRM/NIST System Phantom at 1.5 T and 3 T. Magn Reson Med. 2025;In Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-025-01256-0 [doi]

Cite this abstract

http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/665-04-011