Synopsis
Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
608-03-005 / 271-01-044
ISMRM Abstract
T1 and T2 mapping of the human brain across magnetic field strengths from 0.047 T to 7.0 T
Accepted
Full abstract & presentation
The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.
Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.
To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.
Log inReferences
1. Bottomley PA, Foster TH, Argersinger RE, Pfeifer LM. A review of normal tissue hydrogen NMR relaxation times and relaxation mechanisms from 1–100 MHz: Dependence on tissue type, NMR frequency, temperature, species, excision, and age. Med Phys. 1984;11(4):425-448. doi:10.1118/1.595535 [doi]
2. Korb J, Bryant RG. Magnetic field dependence of proton spin‐lattice relaxation times. Magn Reson Med. 2002;48(1):21-26. doi:10.1002/mrm.10185 [doi]
3. O’Reilly T, Webb AG. In vivo T1 and T2 relaxation time maps of brain tissue, skeletal muscle, and lipid measured in healthy volunteers at 50 mT. Magn Reson Med. 2022;87(2):884-895. doi:10.1002/mrm.29009 [doi]
4. Campbell-Washburn AE, Ramasawmy R, Restivo MC, et al. Opportunities in Interventional and Diagnostic Imaging by Using High-Performance Low-Field-Strength MRI. Radiology. 2019;293(2):384-393. doi:10.1148/radiol.2019190452 [doi]
5. Bojorquez JZ, Bricq S, Acquitter C, Brunotte F, Walker PM, Lalande A. What are normal relaxation times of tissues at 3 T? Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;35:69-80. doi:10.1016/j.mri.2016.08.021 [doi]
6. Wright PJ, Mougin OE, Totman JJ, et al. Water proton T 1 measurements in brain tissue at 7, 3, and 1.5T using IR-EPI, IR-TSE, and MPRAGE: results and optimization. Magn Reson Mater Phys Biol Med. 2008;21(1-2):121-130. doi:10.1007/s10334-008-0104-8 [doi]
7. Balchandani P, Naidich TP. Ultra-High-Field MR Neuroimaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(7):1204-1215. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4180 [doi]
8. Assländer J, Flassbeck S. Magnetization transfer explains most of the T1 variability in the MRI literature. Magn Reson Med. 2025;94(1):293-301. doi:10.1002/mrm.30451 [doi]
9. Karakuzu A, Biswas L, Cohen-Adad J, Stikov N. Vendor-neutral sequences and fully transparent workflows improve inter-vendor reproducibility of quantitative MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2022;88(3):1212-1228. doi:10.1002/mrm.29292 [doi]
10. O’Reilly T, Teeuwisse WM, Webb AG. Three-dimensional MRI in a homogenous 27 cm diameter bore Halbach array magnet. J Magn Reson. 2019;307:106578. doi:10.1016/j.jmr.2019.106578 [doi]
11. Boudreau M, Keenan KE, Stikov N. Chapter 2 - Quantitative T1 and T1ρ Mapping. In: Seiberlich N, Gulani V, Calamante F, et al., eds. Advances in Magnetic Resonance Technology and Applications. Vol 1. Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Academic Press; 2020:19-45. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-817057-1.00004-4 [doi]
12. Ben‐Eliezer N, Sodickson DK, Block KT. Rapid and accurate T2 mapping from multi–spin-echo data using Bloch-simulation-based reconstruction. Magn Reson Med. 2015;73(2):809-817. doi:10.1002/mrm.25156 [doi]
13. Gaser C, Dahnke R, Thompson PM, Kurth F, Luders E, the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. CAT: a computational anatomy toolbox for the analysis of structural MRI data. GigaScience. 2024;13:giae049. doi:10.1093/gigascience/giae049 [doi]
14. Billot B, Greve DN, Puonti O, et al. SynthSeg: Segmentation of brain MRI scans of any contrast and resolution without retraining. Med Image Anal. 2023;86:102789. doi:10.1016/j.media.2023.102789 [doi]
15. Rooney WD, Johnson G, Li X, et al. Magnetic field and tissue dependencies of human brain longitudinal 1H2O relaxation in vivo. Magn Reson Med. 2007;57(2):308-318. doi:10.1002/mrm.21122 [doi]
Cite this abstract
http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/608-03-005