Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026 · Cape Town, South Africa
665-04-010 ISMRM Abstract

Design and Validation of 3D-Printed Microstructure Phantoms to Assess Diffusion-Mediated Susceptibility Effects on R2 and R2*

Primary: Physics & Engineering - Phantoms
Secondary: Contrast Mechanisms - Microstructure
665-04-010 · MR in Organoid/Phantom/Plant/Serum · Thursday, 14 May, 2:35 PM–3:30 PM · Digital Posters Row F
Keywords: Microstructure Phantoms Susceptibility 3D Printing
Accepted
Martina Savic 1, Sebastian Weingärtner2
1TU Delft, Delft, Netherlands
2Department of Imaging Physics, TU Delft, Delft, Netherlands
Presenting Author: Martina Savic

Synopsis

Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

Log in

References

1. Yablonskiy, D.A, Haacke E.M. Theory of NMR signal behavior in magnetically inhomogeneous tissues: the static dephasing regime. Magn Reson Med. 1994 Dec;32(6):749-63. DOI:10.1002/mrm.1910320610 PMID: 7869897 [doi] [pmid]
2. Kiselev V.G., Posse S. Analytical model of susceptibility-induced MR signal dephasing: effect of diffusion in a microvascular network. Magn Reson Med. 1999 Mar;41(3):499-509. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2594(199903)41:3<499::aid-mrm12>3.0.co;2-o PMID: 10204873 [doi] [pmid]
3. Yablonskiy, D.A. Quantitation of intrinsic magnetic susceptibility-related effects in a tissue matrix. Phantom study. Magn. Reson. Med. 1998; 39: 417-428. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910390312 PMID: 9498598 [doi] [pmid]
4. Storey P, Novikov D.S. Signatures of microstructure in gradient-echo and spin-echo signals. Magn Reson Med. 2024; 92: 269-288.DOI: 10.1002/mrm.30022 PMID: 38520259 [doi] [pmid]
5. Witherspoon V.J., Komlosh M.E., Benjamini D., Özarslan E., Lavrik N., Basser P.J. Novel pore size-controlled, susceptibility matched, 3D-printed MRI phantoms. Magn Reson Med. 2024; 91: 2431-2442. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.30029 PMID: 38368618 [doi] [pmid]
6. Woletz, M., Chalupa-Gantner, F., Hager, B., Ricke, A., Mohammadi, S., Binder, S., Baudis, S., Ovsianikov, A., Windischberger, C., Nagy, Z. Toward Printing the Brain: A Microstructural Ground Truth Phantom for MRI. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2024, 9, 2300176. DOI: 10.1002/admt.202300176 [doi]
7. St Quinton, JMP. Magnetic susceptibility of polycrystalline and single crystal holmium from 293-873 KJ. Phys. F: Met. Phys.1973, 3, 597 DOI 10.1088/0305-4608/3/3/018 [doi]
8. Jendrzejewska, I., Groń, T., Tomaszewicz, E., Stokłosa, Z., Goryczka, T., Goraus, J., Pilch, M., Pietrasik, E., Witkowska-Kita, B. Effect of Ho3+ Substitution on Magnetic Properties of ZnCr2Se4. Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jul 19;25(14):7918. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25147918 PMID: 39063159 [doi] [pmid]
9. Christian H. Ziener, Wolfgang R. Bauer, Gerd Melkus, Thomas Weber, Volker Herold, Peter M. Jakob, Structure-specific magnetic field inhomogeneities and its effect on the correlation time, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Volume 24, Issue 10, 2006; 1341-1347 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2006.08.005 [doi]

Cite this abstract

http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/665-04-010