365-04-004 · Body MR: Potpourri of Techniques in Uterine, Cervical, Liver, and Kidney Imaging
· Monday, 11 May, 2:45 PM–3:40 PM · Digital Posters Row F
Nyvenn J da Mota Alves de Castro 1,2,3, Smiti Tripathy1,2,3, Maria C Bustos-Vivas1,2,3,4, David Leitão5,6,7,8, Jordina Aviles Verdera1,3,9, Jana Hutter1,3,9,10
1Smart Imaging Lab, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
2Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
3Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
5Imaging Physics and Engingeering Research Department, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
6Research Dept of Imaging, Physics & Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
7Imaging Physics and Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
8Research Dept of Early Life Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
9School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom
10Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
Presenting Author: Nyvenn J da Mota Alves de Castro
Synopsis
Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation
The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.
Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.
To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.
1. 1. Acton J. Preoperative surgical planning MRI for fibroids: What the surgeon needs to know and what to report. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol n/a, [date unknown]. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.13816. [doi]
2. 2. Kunz G, Leyendecker G. Uterine peristaltic activity during the menstrual cycle: characterization, regulation, function and dysfunction. Reprod Biomed Online 4 Suppl 3: 5–9, 2002. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(12)60108-4. [doi]
3. 3. Leyendecker G, Kunz G, Herbertz M, Beil D, Huppert P, Mall G, Kissler S, Noe M, Wildt L. Uterine peristaltic activity and the development of endometriosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1034: 338–355, 2004. doi: 10.1196/annals.1335.036. [doi]
4. 4. Imaz-Higuera J, Garcia-Casado J, Mira-Tomas JM, Diaz-Martinez A, Faubel PA, Sanz SC, Cortés GC, de Arriba-Garcia M, Aparicio JL, Alberola-Rubio J. Quantitative characterisation of uterine peristalsis propagation throughout the menstrual cycle using a novel intracavitary-electrohysterogram (IC-EHG) method. .
5. 5. Anderson K, Wang S, Pizzella S, Wang Q, Wang Y, Ratts V. The use of transvaginal ultrasound alters physiologic uterine peristalsis in gynecologic participants. FS Rep 5: 296–303, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2024.06.004. [doi]
6. 6. Uhasai K, Naik D, P R. Efficacy of MRI Over Ultrasound in Evaluation of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding With Histopathological Correlation. Cureus 15: e38560, [date unknown]. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38560. [doi]
7. 7. El Said AY, Mahmoud NA, Khater HM. Comparative study between MRI and Ultrasound in evaluation of Uterine lesions. Benha Med J 0: 0–0, 2025. doi: 10.21608/bmfj.2025.344381.2286. [doi]
8. 8. Vidal A, Bora C, von Holzen J, Gulz M, Obmann VC, Pape J, Karrer T, Yilmaz G, von Wolff M. Cine-MRI for Quantifying Uterine Peristalsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 14: 1021, 2025. doi: 10.3390/jcm14031021. [doi]
9. 9. Kido A, Togashi K. Uterine anatomy and function on cine magnetic resonance imaging. Reprod Med Biol 15: 191–199, 2016. doi: 10.1007/s12522-016-0235-y. [doi]
10. 10. Li T, Mirowitz SA. T2-weighted echo planar MR imaging of the abdomen: Optimization of imaging parameters. Clin Imaging 27: 124–128, 2003. doi: 10.1016/S0899-7071(02)00499-0. [doi]
11. 11. Krupa K, Bekiesińska-Figatowska M. Artifacts in Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Pol J Radiol 80: 93–106, 2015. doi: 10.12659/PJR.892628. [doi]
13. 13. Speidel T, Meyer CH, Rasche V. Chapter 30 - Non-cartesian imaging. In: Advances in Magnetic Resonance Technology and Applications, edited by van der Kouwe AJW, Andre JB. Academic Press, p. 481–498.
15. 15. Lim Y, Kumar P, Nayak KS. Speech production real-time MRI at 0.55 T. Magn Reson Med 91: 337–343, 2024. doi: 10.1002/mrm.29843. [doi]
16. 16. Tian Y, Detterich J, Pruetz JD, Yagiz E, Wood JC, Nayak KS. Feasibility of fetal cardiac function and anatomy assessment by real-time spiral balanced steady-state free precession magnetic resonance imaging at 0.55T. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 27: 101130, 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101130. [doi]
17. 17. Ong F, Martin J, Grissom W, Srinivasan S, Johnson KM, Huynh C, Desai A, Zhitao-Li, Tamir J, Sandino C, EfratShimron, Zeng D, Mickevicius N. mikgroup/sigpy: Minor release to trigger Zenodo for DOI. Zenodo: 2022.
18. 18. Tanase C, Boada F. Voronoi Based Sampling Density Correction. .
19. 19. (PDF) The design of simpleITK [Online]. ResearchGate: 2007. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259701414_The_design_of_simpleITK [26 Oct. 2025].
20. 20. Chen L, Huang J, Zhang T, Li J, Cai C, Cai S. Variable density sampling and non-Cartesian super-resolved reconstruction for spatiotemporally encoded single-shot MRI. J Magn Reson 272: 1–9, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2016.08.015. [doi]