Synopsis
Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
562-04-016
ISMRM Abstract
Evaluating the Impact of Deep-Learning-Acceleration on Anatomical Imaging in Pediatrics
Accepted
Full abstract & presentation
The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.
Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.
To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.
Log inReferences
1. Pardoe, H. R., Kucharsky Hiess, R. & Kuzniecky, R. Motion and morphometry in clinical and nonclinical populations. NeuroImage 135, 177–185 (2016).
2. Alexander-Bloch, A. et al. Subtle in-scanner motion biases automated measurement of brain anatomy from in vivo MRI: Motion Bias in Analyses of Structural MRI. Hum. Brain Mapp. 37, 2385–2397 (2016).
3. Reuter, M. et al. Head motion during MRI acquisition reduces gray matter volume and thickness estimates. NeuroImage 107, 107–115 (2015).
4. Savalia, N. K. et al. Motion‐related artifacts in structural brain images revealed with independent estimates of in‐scanner head motion. Hum. Brain Mapp. 38, 472–492 (2017).
5. Ducharme, S. et al. Trajectories of cortical thickness maturation in normal brain development — The importance of quality control procedures. NeuroImage 125, 267–279 (2016).
6. Afacan, O. et al. Evaluation of motion and its effect on brain magnetic resonance image quality in children. Pediatr. Radiol. 46, 1728–1735 (2016).
7. Moqadam, R., Dadar, M. & Zeighami, Y. Investigating the impact of motion in the scanner on brain age predictions. Imaging Neurosci. 2, imag–2–00079 (2024).
8. Ware, A. L. et al. Participant factors that contribute to magnetic resonance imaging motion artifacts in children with mild traumatic brain injury or orthopedic injury. Brain Imaging Behav. 16, 991–1002 (2022).
9. Hodgson, K. et al. Shared Genetic Factors Influence Head Motion During MRI and Body Mass Index. Cereb. Cortex cercor;bhw321v1 (2016) doi:10.1093/cercor/bhw321. [doi]
10. Makowski, C., Lepage, M. & Evans, A. C. Head motion: the dirty little secret of neuroimaging in psychiatry. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 44, 62–68 (2019).
11. Kong, X. et al. Individual Differences in Impulsivity Predict Head Motion during Magnetic Resonance Imaging. PLoS ONE 9, e104989 (2014).
12. Brown, E. N., Pavone, K. J. & Naranjo, M. Multimodal General Anesthesia: Theory and Practice. Anesth. Analg. 127, 1246–1258 (2018).
13. Thieba, C. et al. Factors Associated With Successful MRI Scanning in Unsedated Young Children. Front. Pediatr. 6, 146 (2018).
14. Greene, D. J. et al. Behavioral interventions for reducing head motion during MRI scans in children. NeuroImage 171, 234–245 (2018).
15. Giesbrecht, G. F. et al. Protocol for the Pregnancy During the COVID-19 Pandemic (PdP) Study: A Longitudinal Cohort Study of Mental Health Among Pregnant Canadians During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Developmental Outcomes in Their Children. JMIR Res Protoc 10, e25407 (2021).
16. Fischl, B. FreeSurfer. NeuroImage 62, 774–781 (2012).
17. Huo, Y. et al. Consistent cortical reconstruction and multi-atlas brain segmentation. NeuroImage 138, 197–210 (2016).
18. Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Methodol. 57, 289–300 (1995).
Cite this abstract
http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/562-04-016