Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026 · Cape Town, South Africa
301-04-002 ISMRM Abstract

Simultaneous reconstruction of longitudinal QSM data (Longitudinal-QSM)

Primary: Contrast Mechanisms - Susceptibility/QSM
Secondary: Contrast Mechanisms - Electromagnetic Tissue Properties
301-04-002 · Innovations in Contrast Mechanisms for MRI · Monday, 11 May, 4:10 PM–6:00 PM · Hall 1A
Keywords: Brain Electromagnetic Tissue Properties Image Reconstruction Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) Longitudinal MRI
Accepted
Jiye Kim 1, Hwihun Jeong2, Taechang Kim1, Yangsean Choi3, Jongho Lee1
1Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea, Republic of
2Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States of America
3Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Presenting Author: Jiye Kim

Synopsis

Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

Log in

References

1. Rochefort LD, Brown R, Prince MR, Wang Y. Quantitative MR susceptibility mapping using piece-wise constant regularized inversion of the magnetic field. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2008;60(4):1003-1009. doi:10.1002/mrm.21710 [doi]
2. Zecca L, Youdim MBH, Riederer P, Connor JR, Crichton RR. Iron, brain ageing and neurodegenerative disorders. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2004;5(11):863-873. doi:10.1038/nrn1537 [doi]
3. Daugherty AM, Raz N. Accumulation of iron in the putamen predicts its shrinkage in healthy older adults: A multi-occasion longitudinal study. NeuroImage. 2016;128:11-20. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.12.045 [doi]
4. Zhang Y, Wei H, Cronin MJ, He N, Yan F, Liu C. Longitudinal atlas for normative human brain development and aging over the lifespan using quantitative susceptibility mapping. NeuroImage. 2018;171:176-189. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.01.008 [doi]
5. Zhang Y, Gauthier SA, Gupta A, et al. Longitudinal change in magnetic susceptibility of new enhanced multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions measured on serial quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM). J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016;44(2):426-432. doi:10.1002/jmri.25144 [doi]
6. Chawla S, Kister I, Sinnecker T, et al. Longitudinal study of multiple sclerosis lesions using ultra-high field (7T) multiparametric MR imaging. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(9):e0202918. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0202918 [doi]
7. Thomas GEC, Hannaway N, Zarkali A, Shmueli K, Weil RS. Longitudinal Associations of Magnetic Susceptibility with Clinical Severity in Parkinson’s Disease. Mov Disord. 2024;39(3):546-559. doi:10.1002/mds.29702 [doi]
8. Rua C, Clarke WT, Driver ID, et al. Multi-centre, multi-vendor reproducibility of 7T QSM and R2* in the human brain: Results from the UK7T study. Neuroimage. 2020;223:117358. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117358 [doi]
9. Spincemaille P, Anderson J, Wu G, et al. Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping: MRI at 7T versus 3T. J Neuroimaging. 2020;30(1):65-75. doi:10.1111/jon.12669 [doi]
10. Deh K, Nguyen TD, Eskreis‐Winkler S, et al. Reproducibility of quantitative susceptibility mapping in the brain at two field strengths from two vendors. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;42(6):1592-1600. doi:10.1002/jmri.24943 [doi]
11. Salman F, Ramesh A, Jochmann T, et al. Sensitivity of Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping for Clinical Research in Deep Gray Matter. Hum Brain Mapp. 2025;46(6):e70187. doi:10.1002/hbm.70187 [doi]
12. Liu T, Liu J, Rochefort L de, et al. Morphology enabled dipole inversion (MEDI) from a single‐angle acquisition: Comparison with COSMOS in human brain imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2011;66(3):777-783. doi:10.1002/mrm.22816 [doi]
13. Liu Z, Spincemaille P, Yao Y, Zhang Y, Wang Y. MEDI+0: Morphology enabled dipole inversion with automatic uniform cerebrospinal fluid zero reference for quantitative susceptibility mapping. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2018;79(5):2795-2803. doi:10.1002/mrm.26946 [doi]
14. Kim T, Ji S, Min K, et al. Vessel segmentation for χ$$ \chi $$‐separation in quantitative susceptibility mapping. Magn Reson Med. 2025. doi:10.1002/mrm.70054 [doi]
15. Jenkinson M, Beckmann CF, Behrens TEJ, Woolrich MW, Smith SM. FSL. NeuroImage. 2012;62(2):782-790. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.015 [doi]
16. Liu T, Spincemaille P, Rochefort L de, Kressler B, Wang Y. Calculation of susceptibility through multiple orientation sampling (COSMOS): A method for conditioning the inverse problem from measured magnetic field map to susceptibility source image in MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2009;61(1):196-204. doi:10.1002/mrm.21828 [doi]
17. Kim M, Ji S, Kim J, et al. χ‐sepnet: Deep Neural Network for Magnetic Susceptibility Source Separation. Hum Brain Mapp. 2025;46(2):e70136. doi:10.1002/hbm.70136 [doi]
18. Schweser F, Deistung A, Lehr BW, Reichenbach JR. Quantitative imaging of intrinsic magnetic tissue properties using MRI signal phase: An approach to in vivo brain iron metabolism? NeuroImage. 2011;54(4):2789-2807. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.070 [doi]
19. Wu, Li W, Guidon A, Liu C. Whole brain susceptibility mapping using compressed sensing. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2012;67(1):137-147. doi:10.1002/mrm.23000 [doi]
20. Min K, Sohn B, Kim WJ, et al. A human brain atlas of χ‐separation for normative iron and myelin distributions. NMR Biomed. 2024:e5226. doi:10.1002/nbm.5226 [doi]

Cite this abstract

http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/301-04-002