Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026 · Cape Town, South Africa
366-05-013 ISMRM Abstract

Quantitative synthetic MRI for preoperative assessment of rectal cancer: an independent validation study

Primary: Acquisition & Reconstruction - Quantitative Imaging: chest, abdomen, and pelvis
Secondary: Body - Digestive
366-05-013 · Quantitative Applications in Body MRI: Make the Numbers Count · Monday, 11 May, 4:10 PM–5:05 PM · Digital Posters Row G
Keywords: Rectal neoplasms Validation study Quantitative synthetic MRI MAGnetic resonance image Compilation
Accepted
Jingyu Zhong 1, Jiankun Dai2, Huan Zhang3
1Department of Imaging, Tongren hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
2MR Research, Beijing, China
3Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
Presenting Author: Jingyu Zhong

Synopsis

Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

Log in

References

1. Zhao L, Liang M, Xie L et al (2021) Prediction of pathological prognostic factors of rectal cancer by relaxation maps from synthetic magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 138:109658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109658 [doi]
2. Ma L, Lian S, Liu H et al (2022) Diagnostic performance of synthetic magnetic resonance imaging in the prognostic evaluation of rectal cancer. Quant Imaging Med Surg 12(7):3580-3591. https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-22-24 [doi]
3. Shao J, Zhao W, Ren Q (2022) Value of synthetic magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative assessment of rectal cancer. Modern Digestion & Intervention 27(12):1579-1601. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-2159.2022.12.024 [Article in Chinese] [doi]
4. Zhu K, Chen Z, Cui L, Zhao J, Liu Y, Cao J (2022) The preoperative diagnostic performance of multi-parametric quantitative assessment in rectal carcinoma: a preliminary study using synthetic magnetic resonance imaging. Front Oncol 12:682003. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.682003 [doi]
5. Wang Z, Dai Z, Zhou X, Dai J, Ge Y, Hu S (2024) Synthetic double inversion recovery imaging for rectal cancer T staging evaluation: imaging quality and added value to T2-weighted imaging. Insights Imaging 15(1):256. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-024-01796-4 [doi]
6. Zhang J, Zhu H, Liu X, Huang S, Dong J (2024) Multi-parametric MRI combined with clinical risk factors in preoperative prediction of lymphovascular space invasion in rectal cancer. Anhui Medical Journal 45(6):694-700. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-0399.2024.06.005 [Article in Chinese] [doi]
7. Zhang J, Liu X, Zhu H, Wang T, Huang S, Dong J (2025) The value of synthetic MRI combined with reduced field of view intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion weighted imaging in preoperative predicting TN stage of rectal cancer. Journal of Practical Radiology 41(1):58-62. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-1671.2025.01.013 [Article in Chinese] [doi]

Cite this abstract

http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/366-05-013