Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026 · Cape Town, South Africa
569-05-004 ISMRM Abstract

Whole-Brain Functional MRSI Using ECCENTRIC at 7T: Proof-of-Concept and Feasibility

Primary: Acquisition & Reconstruction - Spectroscopy and spectroscopic imaging
Secondary: Neuro - Neurotransmission
569-05-004 · Spectroscopy and Spectroscopic Imaging: Methods · Wednesday, 13 May, 4:00 PM–4:55 PM · Digital Posters Row J
Keywords: 3D magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging Functional magnetic resonance spectroscopy Brain functional activity Neurometabolism Neurotransmitters
Accepted
Francesca Saviola 1,2, Antoine Klauser3, Dimitri Van De Ville1,2
1Neuro-X Institute, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne - EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
2University of Geneva — Radiology and Medical Informatics, Switzerland
3Swiss Innovation Hub, Siemens Healthineers International AG, Lausanne, Switzerland
Presenting Author: Francesca Saviola

Synopsis

Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

Log in

References

1. Stanley, J. A., & Raz, N. (2018). Functional magnetic resonance spectroscopy: the “new” MRS for cognitive neuroscience and psychiatry research. Frontiers in psychiatry, 9, 76. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00076 [doi]
2. Mullins, P. G. (2018). Towards a theory of functional magnetic resonance spectroscopy (fMRS): a meta‐analysis and discussion of using MRS to measure changes in neurotransmitters in real time. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 59(1), 91-103. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12411 [doi]
3. Klauser, A., Strasser, B., Bogner, W., Hingerl, L., Courvoisier, S., Schirda, C., ... & Andronesi, O. C. (2024). ECCENTRIC: a fast and unrestrained approach for high-resolution in vivo metabolic imaging at ultra-high field MR. Imaging Neuroscience, 2, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1162/imag_a_00313 [doi]
4. Schirda, C. V., Zhao, T., Yushmanov, V. E., Lee, Y., Ghearing, G. R., Lieberman, F. S., ... & Pan, J. W. (2018). Fast 3 D rosette spectroscopic imaging of neocortical abnormalities at 3 T: assessment of spectral quality. Magnetic resonance in medicine, 79(5), 2470-2480. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.26901 [doi]
5. Marques, J. P., Kober, T., Krueger, G., van der Zwaag, W., Van de Moortele, P. F., & Gruetter, R. (2010). MP2RAGE, a self bias-field corrected sequence for improved segmentation and T1-mapping at high field. Neuroimage, 49(2), 1271-1281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.002 [doi]
6. Gaser, C., Dahnke, R., Thompson, P. M., Kurth, F., Luders, E., & Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. (2024). CAT: a computational anatomy toolbox for the analysis of structural MRI data. Gigascience, 13, giae049. https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giae049 [doi]
7. Provencher, S. W. (2001). Automatic quantification of localized in vivo 1H spectra with LCModel. NMR in Biomedicine: An International Journal Devoted to the Development and Application of Magnetic Resonance In Vivo, 14(4), 260-264. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.698 [doi]
8. Winkler, A. M., Ridgway, G. R., Webster, M. A., Smith, S. M., & Nichols, T. E. (2014). Permutation inference for the general linear model. Neuroimage, 92, 381-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.060 [doi]
9. Amunts, K., Mohlberg, H., Bludau, S., & Zilles, K. (2020). Julich-Brain: A 3D probabilistic atlas of the human brain’s cytoarchitecture. Science, 369(6506), 988-992. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb4588 [doi]
10. Maudsley, A. A., Andronesi, O. C., Barker, P. B., Bizzi, A., Bogner, W., Henning, A., ... & Soher, B. J. (2021). Advanced magnetic resonance spectroscopic neuroimaging: Experts' consensus recommendations. NMR in Biomedicine, 34(5), e4309. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.4309 [doi]
11. Kriegeskorte, N., Mur, M., & Bandettini, P. A. (2008). Representational similarity analysis-connecting the branches of systems neuroscience. Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2, 249. https://doi.org/10.3389/neuro.06.004.2008 [doi]
12. Wu, B., Bagshaw, A. P., Hickey, C., Kühn, S., & Wilson, M. (2022). Evidence for distinct neuro-metabolic phenotypes in humans. NeuroImage, 249, 118902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.118902 [doi]
13. Clarke, W. T., Ligneul, C., Cottaar, M., Ip, I. B., & Jbabdi, S. (2024). Universal dynamic fitting of magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 91(6), 2229-2246. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.30001 [doi]
14. Tal, A. (2023). The future is 2D: spectral‐temporal fitting of dynamic MRS data provides exponential gains in precision over conventional approaches. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 89(2), 499-507. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29456 [doi]
15. Zöllner, H. J., Davies‐Jenkins, C., Simicic, D., Tal, A., Sulam, J., & Oeltzschner, G. (2024). Simultaneous multi‐transient linear‐combination modeling of MRS data improves uncertainty estimation. Magnetic resonance in medicine, 92(3), 916-925. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.30110 [doi]

Cite this abstract

http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/569-05-004