Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026 · Cape Town, South Africa
570-09-236 ISMRM Abstract

3D Brain MR Elastography with 1mm isotropic resolution at 3T

Primary: Contrast Mechanisms - Elastography
Secondary: Acquisition & Reconstruction - Pulse Sequence Design: Neuro
570-09-236 · Quantitative Imaging · Wednesday, 13 May, 4:00 PM–4:55 PM · Traditional Posters | Exhibition Hall
Keywords: Elastography 3D-EPI Neuroimaging Ultra-high resolution
Accepted
Yanglei Wu 1, Yishi Wang2, Jakob Schattenfroh1, Carsten Warmuth1, Ingolf Sack1, Jing Guo1
1Department of Radiology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
2MR Research Collaboration, Siemens Healthineers Ltd., Beijing, China
Presenting Author: Yanglei Wu

Synopsis

Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

Log in

References

1. Peng X, Sui Y, Trzasko JD, Glaser KJ, Huston III J, Ehman RL, et al. Fast 3D MR elastography of the whole brain using spiral staircase: Data acquisition, image reconstruction, and joint deblurring. Magnetic resonance in medicine. 2021;86(4):2011–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28855 [doi]
2. Hiscox LV, Johnson CL, McGarry MD, Perrins M, Littlejohn A, van Beek EJ, et al. High-resolution magnetic resonance elastography reveals differences in subcortical gray matter viscoelasticity between young and healthy older adults. Neurobiology of aging. 2018;65:158–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.01.010 [doi]
3. Herthum H, Hetzer S, Kreft B, Tzschätzsch H, Shahryari M, Meyer T, et al. Cerebral tomoelastography based on multifrequency MR elastography in two and three dimensions. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2022;10:1056131. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.1056131 [doi]
4. Sui Y, Arani A, Trzasko JD, Murphy MC, Rossman PJ, Glaser KJ, et al. TURBINE‐MRE: A 3D hybrid radial‐Cartesian EPI acquisition for MR elastography. Magnetic resonance in medicine. 2021;85(2):945–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28445 [doi]
5. Johnson CL, Holtrop JL, McGarry MD, Weaver JB, Paulsen KD, Georgiadis JG, et al. 3D multislab, multishot acquisition for fast, whole‐brain MR elastography with high signal‐to‐noise efficiency. Magnetic resonance in medicine. 2014;71(2):477–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25065 [doi]
6. Braun J, Guo J, Lützkendorf R, Stadler J, Papazoglou S, Hirsch S, et al. High-resolution mechanical imaging of the human brain by three-dimensional multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography at 7T. Neuroimage. 2014;90:308–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.032 [doi]
7. Triolo E, Khegai O, McGarry M, Lam T, Veraart J, Alipour A, et al. Characterizing brain mechanics through 7 tesla magnetic resonance elastography. Physics in Medicine & Biology. 2024;69(20):205011. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad7fc9 [doi]
8. Barnhill E, Nikolova M, Ariyurek C, Dittmann F, Braun J, Sack I. Fast robust dejitter and interslice discontinuity removal in MRI phase acquisitions: application to magnetic resonance elastography. IEEE transactions on medical imaging. 2019;38(7):1578–87. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2019.2893369 [doi]
9. Wang Y, Weng D, Zhang J, Qian T, Liu W, Zhou K, et al. Towards Genuine Three-dimensional Diffusion Imaging with Second Order Gradient Moment Nulling. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.08.611927 [doi]
10. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, Nittka M, Jellus V, Wang J, et al. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magnetic Resonance in Medicine: An Official Journal of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2002;47(6):1202-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.10171 [doi]
11. Haacke EM, Liang Z-P, Boada F. Image reconstruction using projection onto convex sets, model constraints, and linear prediction theory for the removal of phase, motion, and Gibbs artifacts in magnetic resonance and ultrasound imaging. Optical Engineering. 1990;29(5):555-66. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.55624 [doi]
12. Moeller S, Pisharady PK, Ramanna S, Lenglet C, Wu X, Dowdle L, et al. NOise reduction with DIstribution Corrected (NORDIC) PCA in dMRI with complex-valued parameter-free locally low-rank processing. Neuroimage. 2021;226:117539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117539 [doi]
13. Andersson JL, Skare S, Ashburner J. How to correct susceptibility distortions in spin-echo echo-planar images: application to diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroimage. 2003;20(2):870-88. doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00336-7 [doi]
14. Herthum H, Hetzer S, Kreft B, Tzschätzsch H, Shahryari M, Meyer T, et al. Cerebral tomoelastography based on multifrequency MR elastography in two and three dimensions. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2022;10:1056131. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1056131 [doi]

Cite this abstract

http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/570-09-236