Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026 · Cape Town, South Africa
504-03-006 ISMRM Abstract

From 3D TOF to 4D ASL: A Fast Simulation-Driven Few-Shot Deep Learning Approach for Accelerated ASL Angiography

Primary: Neuro - Blood Vessels
Secondary: Acquisition & Reconstruction - Image Reconstruction: AI
504-03-006 · Cutting-Edge Techniques for Intracranial Artery Visualization · Wednesday, 13 May, 1:40 PM–3:30 PM · Ballroom East
Keywords: Angiography AI/ML Image Reconstruction Blood vessels Arterial spin labeling Synthetic data
Accepted
Hao Li 1, Mark Chiew2,3, Iulius Dragonu4, Peter Jezzard1, Thomas Okell1
1Oxford University Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB Division, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
2Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
3Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
4Research & Collaborations GB&I, Siemens Healthcare Ltd., Camberly, United Kingdom
Presenting Author: Hao Li

Synopsis

Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

Log in

References

1. Donahue MJ, Achten E, Cogswell PM, et al. Consensus statement on current and emerging methods for the diagnosis and evaluation of cerebrovascular disease. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2018;38(9):1391-1417. doi:10.1177/0271678X17721830 [doi]
2. Suzuki Y, Fujima N, Van Osch MJP. Intracranial 3D and 4D MR Angiography Using Arterial Spin Labeling: Technical Considerations. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2020;19(4):294-309. doi:10.2463/mrms.rev.2019-0096 [doi]
3. Feng L, Grimm R, Block KT, et al. Golden‐angle radial sparse parallel MRI: Combination of compressed sensing, parallel imaging, and golden‐angle radial sampling for fast and flexible dynamic volumetric MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2014;72(3):707-717. doi:10.1002/mrm.24980 [doi]
4. Zhou Z, Han F, Yu S, et al. Accelerated noncontrast‐enhanced 4‐dimensional intracranial MR angiography using golden‐angle stack‐of‐stars trajectory and compressed sensing with magnitude subtraction. Magn Reson Med. 2018;79(2):867-878. doi:10.1002/mrm.26747 [doi]
5. Feng L, Wen Q, Huang C, Tong A, Liu F, Chandarana H. GRASP‐Pro: imProving GRASP DCE‐MRI through self‐calibrating subspace‐modeling and contrast phase automation. Magn Reson Med. 2020;83(1):94-108. doi:10.1002/mrm.27903 [doi]
6. Okell TW, Chiew M. Optimization of 4D combined angiography and perfusion using radial imaging and arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med. 2023;89(5):1853-1870. doi:10.1002/mrm.29558 [doi]
7. Shen Q, Wu W, Chiew M, Ji Y, Woods JG, Okell TW. Ultra-high temporal resolution 4D angiography using arterial spin labeling with subspace reconstruction. Preprint posted online July 5, 2024. doi:10.1101/2024.07.03.601977 [doi]
8. Zhao T, Tang J, Krumpelman C, et al. Highly accelerated non‐contrast‐enhanced time‐resolved 4D MRA using stack‐of‐stars golden‐angle radial acquisition with a self‐calibrated low‐rank subspace reconstruction. Magn Reson Med. Published online September 30, 2024:mrm.30304. doi:10.1002/mrm.30304 [doi]
9. Knoll F, Hammernik K, Zhang C, et al. Deep-Learning Methods for Parallel Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reconstruction: A Survey of the Current Approaches, Trends, and Issues. IEEE Signal Process Mag. 2020;37(1):128-140. doi:10.1109/MSP.2019.2950640 [doi]
10. Suzuki Y, Koktzoglou I, Li Z, Jezzard P, Okell T. Improved visualization of intracranial distal arteries with multiple 2D slice dynamic ASL ‐ MRA and super‐resolution convolutional neural network. Magn Reson Med. Published online August 18, 2024:mrm.30245. doi:10.1002/mrm.30245 [doi]
11. Li H, Chiew M, Dragonu I, Jezzard P, Okell TW. Few‐shot learning for highly accelerated 3D time‐of‐flight MRA reconstruction. Magn Reson Med. Published online September 10, 2025:mrm.70072. doi:10.1002/mrm.70072 [doi]
12. Li H, Chiew M, Dragonu I, Jezzard P, Okell TW. Highly Accelerated 3D TOF MRA using Deep Learning Reconstruction with Raw K-space Simulation. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the ISMRM. 2025:1212.
13. Okell TW, Chappell MA, Woolrich MW, Günther M, Feinberg DA, Jezzard P. Vessel‐encoded dynamic magnetic resonance angiography using arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med. 2010;64(3):698-706. doi:10.1002/mrm.22458 [doi]
14. Lustig M, Donoho D, Pauly JM. Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2007;58(6):1182-1195. doi:10.1002/mrm.21391 [doi]
15. Trzasko J, Manduca A. Local versus Global Low-Rank Promotion in Dynamic MRI Series Reconstruction. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the ISMRM. 2011:4371.
16. Korhonen J, You J. Peak signal-to-noise ratio revisited: Is simple beautiful? In: 2012 Fourth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience. IEEE; 2012:37-38. doi:10.1109/QoMEX.2012.6263880 [doi]
17. Wang Z, Simoncelli EP, Bovik AC. Multiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment. In: The Thrity-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, 2003. IEEE; 2003:1398-1402. doi:10.1109/ACSSC.2003.1292216 [doi]
18. De Buck MHS, Jezzard P, Hess AT. Optimization of undersampling parameters for 3D intracranial compressed sensing MR angiography at 7 T. Magn Reson Med. 2022;88(2):880-889. doi:10.1002/mrm.29236 [doi]
19. Hu T, Fan J, Wu Q, Zhou DX. Learning theory approach to minimum error entropy criterion. J Mach Learn Res. 2013;14(1):377-397.

Cite this abstract

http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/504-03-006