Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026 · Cape Town, South Africa
560-01-009 ISMRM Abstract

Modular Framework for Automated QSM Integration into Deep Brain Stimulation Neurosurgical Planning Systems

Accepted
Eric Cito 1, Lee Reid1, Devin Schoen1, Skyler Deutsch1, Cherise Wong1, Ahmad Alhourani2, Marta San Luciano Palenzuela3, Philip A Starr2, Melanie A Morrison1
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States of America
2Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States of America
3Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States of America
Presenting Author: Eric Cito

Synopsis

Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

Log in

References

1. Dimov, A. V., Gupta, A., Kopell, B. H. & Wang, Y. High-resolution QSM for functional and structural depiction of subthalamic nuclei in DBS presurgical mapping. J. Neurosurg. 131, 360–367 (2019). doi: 10.3171/2018.3.JNS172145 [doi]
2. Wei, H. et al. Precise targeting of the globus pallidus internus with quantitative susceptibility mapping for deep brain stimulation surgery. J. Neurosurg. 133, 1605–1611 (2020). doi: 10.3171/2019.7.JNS191254 [doi]
3. Cajigas, I., Morrison, M. A., Luciano, M. S. & Starr, P. A. Cerebellar deep brain stimulation for the treatment of movement disorders in cerebral palsy. J. Neurosurg. 1–10 (2023) doi:10.3171/2023.1.JNS222289. [doi]
4. Rashid, T., Hwang, R., DiMarzio, M., Hancu, I. & Pilitsis, J. G. Evaluating the role of 1.5 T quantitative susceptibility mapping for subthalamic nucleus targeting in deep brain stimulation surgery. J. Neuroradiol. 48, 37–42 (2021). doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2019.04.007 [doi]
5. QSM Consensus Organization Committee et al. Recommended implementation of quantitative susceptibility mapping for clinical research in the brain: A consensus of the ISMRM electro‐magnetic tissue properties study group. Magn. Reson. Med. 91, 1834–1862 (2024). doi:10.1002/mrm.30006 [doi]
6. Chan, K.-S. & Marques, J. P. SEPIA—Susceptibility mapping pipeline tool for phase images. NeuroImage 227, 117611 (2021). doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117611 [doi]
7. Stewart, A. W. et al. QSMxT: Robust masking and artifact reduction for quantitative susceptibility mapping. Magn. Reson. Med. 87, 1289–1300 (2022). doi:10.1002/mrm.29048 [doi]
8. Sudhyadhom, A., Haq, I. U., Foote, K. D., Okun, M. S. & Bova, F. J. A high resolution and high contrast MRI for differentiation of subcortical structures for DBS targeting: The Fast Gray Matter Acquisition T1 Inversion Recovery (FGATIR). NeuroImage 47, T44–T52 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.018 [doi]
9. Isensee, F. et al. Automated brain extraction of multisequence MRI using artificial neural networks. Hum. Brain Mapp. 40, 4952–4964 (2019). doi: 10.1002/hbm.24750 [doi]
10. Avants, B. B. et al. A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration. NeuroImage 54, 2033–2044 (2011). doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.025 [doi]
11. Reid, L., Starr, P. A., Wang, D. D. & Morrison, M. A. A Novel Framework Architecture that Ensures Orientation Safety in Medical Imaging Software at Compile Time. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.174319903.35909702/v1 (2025). [doi]

Cite this abstract