Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026 · Cape Town, South Africa
405-04-005 ISMRM Abstract

Evaluation of Stimulated Echo Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Patients with Suspected Prostate Cancer

Primary: Body - Prostate
Secondary: Diffusion - Diffusion Acquisition
405-04-005 · From Diffusion Characteristics Toward Clinical Impact · Tuesday, 12 May, 4:00 PM–5:50 PM · Ballroom West
Keywords: Prostate Stimulated Echos Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)
Accepted
Srijyotsna Volety 1,2, Felix Schön2,3, Ali Pirasteh1,2, Diego Hernando1,2
1Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, United States of America
2Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, United States of America
3Institute and Polyclinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
Presenting Author: Srijyotsna Volety

Synopsis

Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

Log in

References

1. R. L. Siegel, K. D. Miller, N. S. Wagle, and A. Jemal, “Cancer statistics, 2023,” CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 17–48, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21763. [doi]
2. B. Turkbey et al., “Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2,” Eur Urol, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 340–351, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.033. [doi]
3. J. O. Barentsz et al., “Synopsis of the PI-RADS v2 Guidelines for Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Recommendations for Use,” European urology, vol. 69, no. 1, p. 41, Sep. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.038. [doi]
4. Y. Zhang, S. A. Wells, B. L. Triche, F. Kelcz, and D. Hernando, “Stimulated-echo diffusion-weighted imaging with moderate b values for the detection of prostate cancer,” Eur Radiol, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 3236–3244, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06689-w. [doi]
5. S. Aja-Fernández, T. Pie¸ciak, and G. Vegas-Sánchez-Ferrero, “Spatially variant noise estimation in MRI: A homomorphic approach,” Medical Image Analysis, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 184–197, Feb. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.media.2014.11.005. [doi]
6. N. M. Lucarelli et al., “Quantitative ADC: An Additional Tool in the Evaluation of Prostate Cancer?,” Journal of Personalized Medicine, vol. 13, no. 9, p. 1378, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.3390/jpm13091378. [doi]
7. E. Łuczyńska et al., “The Utility of Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) Using Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Values in Discriminating Between Prostate Cancer and Normal Tissue,” Polish Journal of Radiology, vol. 79, p. 450, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.12659/PJR.890805. [doi]
8. M. D. Pickles, P. Gibbs, M. Sreenivas, and L. W. Turnbull, “Diffusion-weighted imaging of normal and malignant prostate tissue at 3.0T,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 130–134, 2006, doi: 10.1002/jmri.20477. [doi]

Cite this abstract

http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/405-04-005