Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026
· Cape Town, South Africa
560-03-010
ISMRM Abstract
Uncertainty-Guided Active Learning for Access Route Segmentation and Planning in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Primary:
Cardiovascular - Vascular and Vessel Wall
Secondary:
Analysis Methods - Segmentation and Detection
560-03-010 · Congenital Heart Disease, Valves, and Vessels
· Wednesday, 13 May, 1:40 PM–2:35 PM · Digital Posters Row A
Keywords:Cardiovascular magnetic resonanceActive learningVessel diameter quantificationAortic segmentationTAVI planning
Accepted
Enrique Almar-Munoz 1, Mahdi Islam1, Musarrat Tabassum1, Christian Kremser1, Markus Haltmeier2, Agnes Mayr1
1Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
2University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
Presenting Author: Enrique Almar-Munoz
Synopsis
Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation
The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.
Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.
To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.
1. Díez, J. G. (2013). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): the hype and the hope. Texas Heart Institute Journal, 40(3), 298.
2. Al-Najafi, S., Sanchez, F., & Lerakis, S. (2016). The crucial role of cardiac imaging in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): pre-and post-procedural assessment. Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 18(12), 70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-016-0497-z [doi]
3. Mahon, C., & Mohiaddin, R. H. (2021). The emerging applications of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Clinical Radiology, 76(1), 73-e21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2019.11.011 [doi]
4. Mayr, A., Klug, G., Reinstadler, S. J., Feistritzer, H. J., Reindl, M., Kremser, C., ... & Metzler, B. (2018). Is MRI equivalent to CT in the guidance of TAVR? A pilot study. European Radiology, 28(11), 4625-4634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5386-2 [doi]
5. Reindl, M., Lechner, I., Holzknecht, M., Tiller, C., Fink, P., Oberhollenzer, F., ... & Reinstadler, S. J. (2023). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography to guide transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial. Circulation, 148(16), 1220-1230. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.066498 [doi]
6. Dijkstra, E. W. (2022). A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. In Edsger Wybe Dijkstra: his life, work, and legacy (pp. 287-290). https://doi.org/10.1145/3544585.3544600 [doi]
7. Maurer, C. R., Qi, R., & Raghavan, V. (2003). A linear time algorithm for computing exact Euclidean distance transforms of binary images in arbitrary dimensions. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 25(2), 265-270. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2003.1177156 [doi]
8. Sato, Y., Nakajima, S., Atsumi, H., Koller, T., Gerig, G., Yoshida, S., & Kikinis, R. (1997, March). 3D multi-scale line filter for segmentation and visualization of curvilinear structures in medical images. In International Conference on Computer Vision, Virtual Reality, and Robotics in Medicine (pp. 213-222). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0029240 [doi]
9. Isensee, F., Jaeger, P. F., Kohl, S. A., Petersen, J., & Maier-Hein, K. H. (2021). nnU-Net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation. Nature methods, 18(2), 203-211. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-020-01008-z [doi]
10. Ma, J., Li, F., & Wang, B. (2024). U-mamba: Enhancing long-range dependency for biomedical image segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.04722.