1Department of Electronic Science, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Plasma and Magnetic Resonance, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
2Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, United States of America
3Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital (Xiamen), Xiamen, China
4Clinical and Technical Support, Philips Healthcare (Beijing), Beijing, China
5Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
Presenting Author: Longkun Chen
Synopsis
Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation
The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.
Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.
To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.
1. Duyn JH, Schenck J. Contributions to magnetic susceptibility of brain tissue. NMR Biomed. 2017;30(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.3546 [doi]
2. Li X, Bu S, Pang H, et al. Association of myelin disruption and iron accumulation on MRI with Parkinson's disease severity. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2025;62(4):1105‐1116. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.2983 [doi]
3. Emmerich J, Bachert P, Ladd ME, Straub S. On the separation of susceptibility sources in quantitative susceptibility mapping: Theory and phantom validation with an in vivo application to multiple sclerosis lesions of different age. J Magn Reson. 2021;330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2021.107033 [doi]
4. Shin H, Lee J, Yun Y, et al. χ-separation: Magnetic susceptibility source separation toward iron and myelin mapping in the brain. Neuroimage. 2021;240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118371 [doi]
5. Chen J, Gong N-J, Chaim KT, et al. Decompose quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) to sub-voxel diamagnetic and paramagnetic components based on gradient-echo MRI data. Neuroimage. 2021;242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118477 [doi]
6. Li Z, Feng R, Liu Q, et al. APART-QSM: An improved sub-voxel quantitative susceptibility mapping for susceptibility source separation using an iterative data fitting method. Neuroimage. 2023;274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120148 [doi]
7. Dimov A, Gillen K, Nguyen T, et al. Magnetic susceptibility source separation solely from gradient echo data: Histological validation. Tomography. 2022;8(3):1544‐1551. https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography8030127 [doi]
8. Yang QQ, Chen LK, Ge NW, et al. Rapid whole-brain T2* and susceptibility mapping using 3D multiple overlapping-echo detachment acquisition and missing modality synthesis embedded simulation. Magn Reson Med. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.70108 [doi]
9. Kim M, Ji S, Kim J, et al. χ-sepnet: Deep neural network for magnetic susceptibility source separation. Hum Brain Mapp. 2025;46(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118371 [doi]