Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026 · Cape Town, South Africa
464-06-011 ISMRM Abstract

Reduced-FOV Prostate DWI Using Frequency-Swept Pulses

Primary: Acquisition & Reconstruction - Pulse Sequence Design: Non-Neuro
Secondary: Body - Prostate
464-06-011 · Novel Diffusion and Motion Correction in Body MRI · Tuesday, 12 May, 4:55 PM–5:50 PM · Digital Posters Row E
Keywords: Prostate Adiabatic Pulse Reduced field-of-view Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) Frequency-swept pulses
Accepted
Michael J Jaroszewicz1, Rudy Rizzo1, Tejinder Kaur1, Nicole Seiberlich1,2, Hero K Hussain1, Vikas Gulani1, Yun Jiang 1,2
1Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States of America
2Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States of America
Presenting Author: Yun Jiang

Synopsis

Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

Log in

References

1. Turkbey, B.; Rosenkrantz, A. B.; Haider, M. A.; Padhani, A. R.; Villeirs, G.; Macura, K. J.; Tempany, C. M.; Choyke, P. L.; Cornud, F.; Margolis, D. J.; Thoeny, H. C.; Verma, S.; Barentsz, J.; Weinreb, J. C. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2. Eur. Urol. 2019, 76 (3), 340–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.033. [doi]
2. Hargreaves, B. A.; Worters, P. W.; Pauly, K. B.; Pauly, J. M.; Koch, K. M.; Gold, G. E. Metal-Induced Artifacts in MRI. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2011, 197 (3), 547–555. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.7364. [doi]
3. Saritas, E. U.; Cunningham, C. H.; Lee, J. H.; Han, E. T.; Nishimura, D. G. DWI of the Spinal Cord with Reduced FOV Single‐shot EPI. Magn. Reson. Med. 2008, 60 (2), 468–473. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.21640. [doi]
4. Korn, N.; Kurhanewicz, J.; Banerjee, S.; Starobinets, O.; Saritas, E.; Noworolski, S. Reduced-FOV Excitation Decreases Susceptibility Artifact in Diffusion-Weighted MRI with Endorectal Coil for Prostate Cancer Detection. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2015, 33 (1), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2014.08.040. [doi]
5. Rieseberg, S.; Frahm, J.; Finsterbusch, J. Two‐dimensional Spatially‐selective RF Excitation Pulses in Echo‐planar Imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 2002, 47 (6), 1186–1193. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.10157. [doi]
6. Feinberg, D. A.; Hoenninger, J. C.; Crooks, L. E.; Kaufman, L.; Watts, J. C.; Arakawa, M. Inner Volume MR Imaging: Technical Concepts and Their Application. Radiology 1985, 156 (3), 743–747. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.156.3.4023236. [doi]
7. Andronesi, O. C.; Ramadan, S.; Ratai, E.-M.; Jennings, D.; Mountford, C. E.; Sorensen, A. G. Spectroscopic Imaging with Improved Gradient Modulated Constant Adiabaticity Pulses on High-Field Clinical Scanners. J. Magn. Reson. 2010, 203 (2), 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2010.01.010. [doi]
8. Deelchand, D. K.; Berrington, A.; Noeske, R.; Joers, J. M.; Arani, A.; Gillen, J.; Schär, M.; Nielsen, J.; Peltier, S.; Seraji‐Bozorgzad, N.; Landheer, K.; Juchem, C.; Soher, B. J.; Noll, D. C.; Kantarci, K.; Ratai, E. M.; Mareci, T. H.; Barker, P. B.; Öz, G. Across‐vendor Standardization of semi‐LASER for Single‐voxel MRS at 3T. NMR Biomed. 2021, 34 (5), e4218. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.4218. [doi]
9. Pipe, J. G. Spatial Encoding and Reconstruction in MRI with Quadratic Phase Profiles. Magn. Reson. Med. 1995, 33 (1), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910330105. [doi]
10. Lo, W.; Chen, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Hamilton, J.; Grimm, R.; Griswold, M.; Gulani, V.; Seiberlich, N. Realistic 4D MRI Abdominal Phantom for the Evaluation and Comparison of Acquisition and Reconstruction Techniques. Magn. Reson. Med. 2019, 81 (3), 1863–1875. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27545. [doi]
11. Schenck, J. F. The Role of Magnetic Susceptibility in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: MRI Magnetic Compatibility of the First and Second Kinds. Med. Phys. 1996, 23 (6), 815–850. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.597854. [doi]
12. Griswold, M. A.; Jakob, P. M.; Heidemann, R. M.; Nittka, M.; Jellus, V.; Wang, J.; Kiefer, B.; Haase, A. Generalized Autocalibrating Partially Parallel Acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn. Reson. Med. 2002, 47 (6), 1202–1210. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.10171. [doi]
13. Surov, A.; Meyer, H. J.; Wienke, A. Correlations between Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Gleason Score in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review. Eur. Urol. Oncol. 2020, 3 (4), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2018.12.006. [doi]

Cite this abstract

http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/464-06-011